Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than LG K52, having an 87.1 score against 76. Although LG Velvet and LG K52 were released with only a few months difference, LG Velvet is a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The LG Velvet has a bit faster processing unit than LG K52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
The LG Velvet counts with a sharper display than LG K52, because it has a bit larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460. LG Velvet features a better camera than LG K52, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG Velvet also has a way better video definition.
The LG Velvet features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal memory. LG Velvet features just a bit better battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.