Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than the LG K52, getting an 85.5 score against 76. Although Galaxy A51 is older than LG K52, it's body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a more vivid screen than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot better display density. The Samsung Galaxy A51's processor is just as good as the processing unit in LG K52, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
LG K52 features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better camera than LG K52, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG K52 and Samsung Galaxy A51 feature incredibly similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.