Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the LG K52, with an 81.2 score against 76. The Galaxy Note 3 design has the same thickness than LG K52, but it is a little lighter. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while LG K52 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3's CPU is very similar to the LG K52 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a higher display density.
The LG K52 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG K52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the LG K52 also has a lot bigger sensor, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a back camera with way more megapixels.
LG K52 features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.