Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than LG K52, getting a score of 93.6 against 76. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older and just a bit heavier than the LG K52, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features and better performance.
The Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 5G has a much better looking screen than LG K52, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher display density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
LG K52 has a better storage for applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels resolution and a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lot worse quality photographs, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than LG K52, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.