Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than LG K52, with a 94.8 score against 76. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy S20's body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG K52, although they were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit superior processor than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 features a way better screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a lot higher pixel amount per inch of display.
The Galaxy S20 has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG K52, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG K52 and Samsung Galaxy S20 have extremely similar battery performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 takes a bit better photos and videos than LG K52, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a larger sensor and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.