Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than the LG K52, getting a overall score of 93.4 against 76. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features and increased performance. Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and somewhat lighter than LG K52.
The Galaxy S22 has just a little better performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a much better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 takes a lot better photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a back camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video definition. The LG K52 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG K52 features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.