Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than LG K52, with a overall score of 92.3 against 76. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the LG K52 were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster CPU than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better looking screen than LG K52, because it has a way greater pixels number per inch in the screen, a little larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back and a much smaller sensor shooting much lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
LG K52 has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.