Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the LG K62, having a 91.3 score against 78.2. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body has the same thickness than the LG K62, but it's a little bit heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while LG K62 has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a better looking display than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's processor is just as good as LG K62's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG K62 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery duration than LG K62, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.