Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than LG K62, with a general score of 90.8 against 78.2. The Galaxy Note 20 is a a little heavier phone than LG K62, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processor than LG K62, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a better display than LG K62, because it has a better count of pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display. The LG K62 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG K62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit longer battery life than LG K62, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.