Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the LG K62, having an 86.3 score against 78.2. The Galaxy S10e design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than LG K62, even though it was released around 21 months before. Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better performance than LG K62, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a brighter screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S10e has just a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution and a much tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher (4K) video quality.
LG K62 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.