Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the LG K62's 78.2 global score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG K62 were only released with a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is thinner but also heavier than LG K62.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a more vivid screen than LG K62, because it has a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a better count of pixels per display inch and a larger screen. The LG K62 features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a camera with a way worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera sensor.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K62, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.