Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than LG K62, with an 87.9 score against 78.2. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Despite being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than LG K62.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better screen than LG K62, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a higher pixels density and a little bit bigger screen.
LG K62 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K62 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features better battery duration than LG K62, because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than LG K62, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.