Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is better than the HTC U11's general score of 77.6. LG K92 is a notably newer cellphone than the HTC U11, although it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U11 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
HTC U11 counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher screen density. The LG K92 shoots better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
LG K92 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG K92 counts with better battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
The LG K92 is way more expensive than the HTC U11, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.