Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Titan gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's score of 82.5. LG K92's construction is notably newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has the older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little faster processor than LG K92. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V30S ThinQ and LG K92 both feature extremely similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal storage. The LG K92 features superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
LG K92 features a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG K92 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.