Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Titan gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than the Motorola One Action, getting a global score of 85.4 against 78.5. Although the LG K92 is heavier than Motorola One Action, it's a little thinner and newer. The Motorola One Action features a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a just a bit higher pixels density.
LG K92 has a bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Action's CPU is just as good as the CPU in LG K92, and although the Motorola One Action has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG K92 counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14% larger battery size. LG K92 counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also has a lot higher resolution camera.
The LG K92 costs more than Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.