Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Titan gray | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 score. The LG K92 design is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision's, but it is heavier. LG K92 and Motorola One Vision both have incredibly similar processing units, and although the Motorola One Vision has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Vision features a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a little more pixels per screen inch. The LG K92 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a lot better resolution camera. LG K92 features just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.