Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than the Galaxy S7, with an 85.4 score against 79.5. Although the LG K92 is newer than Galaxy S7, it is noticeably heavier and just a little bit thicker. The LG K92 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater number of cores (although slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better display than LG K92, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG K92 features a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG K92 has a way better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG K92 has greater battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG K92, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S7, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.