Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.11 x 2.55 x 0.42 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 420 hours standby time 18.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is way better than the LG Lancet's score of 57.7. LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system, while LG Lancet has Windows Phone 8.1 operating system. The LG V50 ThinQ design is a lot thinner but notably heavier than LG Lancet. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking display than LG Lancet, because it has a much better pixel density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a much larger screen.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Lancet, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much powerful CPU than LG Lancet, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than LG Lancet, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much better pictures and videos than LG Lancet, because it has a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the LG Lancet, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.