Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.6 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-02-22 | 2020-06-19 |
| 4.99 x 2.65 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 370.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 217 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 422 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than the LG Optimus 3D MAX's overall score of 58.3. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while LG Optimus 3D MAX has Android 2.3.6. The Galaxy A71 5G design is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but way heavier than LG Optimus 3D MAX.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a faster CPU than LG Optimus 3D MAX, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Optimus 3D MAX, because it has much more pixels per inch in the display, a really bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Optimus 3D MAX, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than LG Optimus 3D MAX, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 5G has a way better battery lifetime than LG Optimus 3D MAX, because it has a 196 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a bit more than the LG Optimus 3D MAX, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.