Global Score | |
57.4 | 63.1 |
Basic Information | |
LG | ZTE |
Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.1 |
2014-10-01 | 2015-07-14 |
5.02 x 2.67 x 0.42 inches | 6.06 x 2.90 x 0.37 inches |
4.57 ounces | 5.99 ounces |
-- | Blue, Gold and Gray |
-- | Aluminum; plastic |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 249.00 | $ 135.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
IPS LCD | TFT |
207 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
7.6 | 8.8 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM 8915 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974 chipset |
64-bit 64-bit (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Single-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
9 | 8.46 |
Storage | |
4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
3.82 | 5.8 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
-- | f/1.80 aperture |
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
5.94 | 9.57 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
-- | Mobile Hotspot |
GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
2.5 | 6.5 |
Battery Life | |
2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
216 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
4 | 4.96 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
GPS | GPS |
-- | NFC |
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The ZTE Axon has a score of 63.1, which is a little bit better than LG Optimus F60's global score of 57.4. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon has a newer 5.1 version while LG Optimus F60 has Android 4.4.2 version, counting with a couple additional features and some performance improvements. The ZTE Axon is a newer and thinner cellphone than the LG Optimus F60, although it's noticeably heavier.
LG Optimus F60 has a little bit better performance than ZTE Axon, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit, a larger number of cores (although slower) and an additional graphics processing unit. ZTE Axon has a much better screen than LG Optimus F60, because it has a lot more pixels per screen inch, a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a larger screen.
The ZTE Axon has a greater camera than LG Optimus F60, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The ZTE Axon features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Optimus F60, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon features a very superior battery life than LG Optimus F60, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The ZTE Axon not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.