Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.06 x 2.62 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1400 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 7.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than LG Optimus L9 II's 59.5 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner but much heavier phone than the LG Optimus L9 II. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and LG Optimus L9 II has Android 4.4.2 version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior performance than LG Optimus L9 II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a much larger display and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes a lot better photographs and videos than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more MP back camera. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better battery life than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2150mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the LG Optimus L9 II.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.