Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 67.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.7, 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-12-14 | 2016-12-01 |
| 5.02 x 2.72 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 305 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.9 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC Desire 650 has a global score of 67.1, which is better than LG Prada 3.0's 58.3 score. HTC Desire 650's construction has the same thickness than LG Prada 3.0, but it is just a little heavier. The HTC Desire 650 has a bit better hardware performance than LG Prada 3.0, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
HTC Desire 650 has a little more vivid screen than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a better number of pixels per inch of screen, a larger screen and a way better 720 x 1280 resolution. The HTC Desire 650 counts with a much bigger memory to install games and applications than LG Prada 3.0, because it has 16 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC Desire 650 counts with a much better battery life than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a 2200mAh battery size instead of 1540mAh. The HTC Desire 650 has a little bit better camera than LG Prada 3.0, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the HTC Desire 650 also has a lot higher 13 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations.
HTC Desire 650 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.