Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.7, 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-12-14 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.02 x 2.72 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| -- | Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 199.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Fast has an overall score of 72.2, which is way better than the LG Prada 3.0's 58.3 overall score. The Moto G Fast is a a lot newer cellphone than LG Prada 3.0, although it is a bit thicker and notably heavier. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Fast has 11 version and LG Prada 3.0 has Android 4.0.
Motorola Moto G Fast features a superior processing unit than LG Prada 3.0, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Moto G Fast counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 720 x 1560 and a much bigger display.
The Moto G Fast features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Prada 3.0, because it has 32 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Fast features a really longer battery duration than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Moto G Fast takes way better photographs and videos than LG Prada 3.0, because it has a lot larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Moto G Fast is a little more expensive than LG Prada 3.0, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.