Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6, with a global score of 80 against 76.7. The Google Pixel 3 is an older device than the LG Stylo 6, but Google was able to make it just a little bit thinner and way lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a bit faster CPU than LG Stylo 6. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower resolution camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.