Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Holographic white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, with an 81.9 score against 76.7. The Google Pixel 4 body is extremely lighter and a little thinner than the LG Stylo 6, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 4 has just a little better performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. LG Stylo 6 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent more battery size. Google Pixel 4 takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos.
Google Pixel 4 is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.