Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the LG V20's 77 global score. Even though the Google Nexus 6P is older and just a bit heavier than the LG V20, it's design is still just a bit thinner. The Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better looking display than LG V20. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a higher pixels quantity in each screen inch and a screen of the same size.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more cores (although slower). Google Nexus 6P and LG V20 feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the Google Nexus 6P has a way less MP back camera, a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and videos in poorly lited environments and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
LG V20 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Nexus 6P features just a bit longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.