Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than LG V20's global score of 77. The Google Pixel 2 design is newer and lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than the LG V20. Google Pixel 2 has a bit faster processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 2 also has a larger number of faster cores.
The LG V20 features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a bit bigger display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V20 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The LG V20 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V20 features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 costs a little more than the LG V20, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.