Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the LG V20, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 77. Although Google Pixel XL and the LG V20 were released with only 1 months difference, the Google Pixel XL body is somewhat thicker but also just a little lighter. The LG V20 and the Google Pixel XL both count with quite similar processors, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel XL counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen. The LG V20 has a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much better 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Google Pixel XL has a bit longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V20, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.