Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the LG V20's 77 general score. LG V50 ThinQ is a extremely newer cellphone than LG V20, but it's just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than LG V20, because it has a just a little greater display density, a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bit larger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a better memory to install applications and games than LG V20, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, else you can save some money and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.