Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than LG V20, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 77. Motorola Edge 50 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the LG V20, although it's a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter display than LG V20, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen.
LG V20 counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser processing cores and 4 GB lesser RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 takes much better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.