Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is just a bit better than LG V20, with a 79.8 score against 77. Moto Z4's construction is newer, a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than LG V20. LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixel density.
The LG V20 counts with a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z4, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z4 features a bit superior CPU than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto Z4 also has 4 more cpu cores.
Moto Z4 has a much better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto Z4 also has a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Moto Z4 has a little longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola Moto Z4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.