Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is better than LG V20's score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a incredibly newer phone than LG V20, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V20 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixel count per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The LG V20 counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with a little faster processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A32 also has 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy A32 features just a bit better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera. Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.