Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than the LG V20, having a overall score of 84.9 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A80 body is extremely newer than LG V20's, although it's noticeably heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A80 features a little bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
LG V20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor.
The LG V20 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A80 features just a bit better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.