Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than LG V20's overall score of 77. The Galaxy A90 5G is a incredibly newer cellphone than LG V20, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V20 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit faster CPU than LG V20, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than LG V20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
LG V20 has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.