Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the LG V20's 77 general score. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is a bit heavier but just a little thinner than the LG V20, and they were released only 5 months apart. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V20 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. LG V20 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 MP resolution, the LG V20 also has a lot higher video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The LG V20 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features greater battery duration than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.