Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is a bit better than LG V20, getting an 83.3 score against 77. The Galaxy M30s is a way newer cellphone than LG V20, although it is somewhat thicker and just a little heavier. Galaxy M30s features a little bit better performance than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy M30s also has 4 more cores.
LG V20 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG V20 features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a way better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has an 88 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy M30s takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG V20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.