Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than LG V20's score of 77. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner than the LG V20's, but it is much heavier. The LG V20 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking display than LG V20, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a really larger display and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than LG V20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than LG V20, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V20, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.