Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the LG V20's 77 score. The vivo X60 Pro is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the LG V20, but both are 0.3inches thick. The LG V20 has a slightly better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The LG V20 features more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 Pro has a superior processing unit than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro has a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The vivo X60 Pro has improved battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 31% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.