Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-09-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 overall score. Google Nexus 6P's body has the same thickness than the LG V30, but it's somewhat heavier. LG V30 has a little bit better display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little bigger display, a little bit higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a bit greater display pixel density.
The LG V30 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 features a bit faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30 also has more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 5% larger battery size. LG V30 has a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a much smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V30 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V30. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, else you can save some money and buy the LG V30, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.