Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than LG V30's global score of 79.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is newer than LG V30, it is extremely heavier and thicker. The LG V30 features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way greater screen density.
The LG V30 has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. LG V30 has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A32 captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 has a way better battery life than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.