Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than LG V30, getting a 91.8 score against 79.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is much newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than LG V30. Galaxy A71 5G's CPU is just as good as the LG V30 one, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is more expensive than the LG V30, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.