Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s is better than LG V30, with an 88 score against 79.1. Even though the Galaxy M31s is incredibly newer than LG V30, it's much heavier and way thicker. The Samsung Galaxy M31s and LG V30 feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy M31s has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The LG V30 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better count of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy M31s shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
The LG V30 has a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31s features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.