Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. The LG V30 design is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's a lot thicker and was released 7 years before. The LG V30 counts with a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG V30, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a really larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a back camera with way more MP and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 73 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V30 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.