Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is noticeably newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is a bit thicker and a little heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos and a back facing camera with a lot lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.