Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | -- |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than LG K61, with an 81.3 score against 77.6. LG V35 ThinQ's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG K61, although it was released only 23 months before. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than LG K61, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixels number per display inch.
The LG K61 counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K61 also has 64 GB more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than LG K61, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The LG K61 features improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.