Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the LG K62, getting an 81.3 score against 78.2. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is much older than LG K62, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. LG V35 ThinQ features a lot better looking display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better display pixel density and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a lot worse 16 MP resolution back facing camera and a way smaller sensor capturing much lower quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG K62 features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has 64 GB more internal memory. The LG K62 features superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.