Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a global score of 85.4 against 81.3. The LG K92 construction is a lot newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's thicker and a lot heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than LG K92. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The LG K92 takes much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The LG K92 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal memory. LG K92 has greater battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG K92, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.