Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG V10, getting an 81.3 score against 78.6. The LG V35 ThinQ body is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the LG V10. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more powerful processor than LG V10, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
LG V10 has just a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit worse display pixel density and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440. The LG V10's memory for games and applications is just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, both have equal internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V10 has a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 MP resolution and the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and faster video frame rate.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 10% more battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the LG V10, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.