Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-06-17 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Defy (2021), having an 81.3 score against 77.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an noticeably older phone than the Motorola Defy (2021), but it is extremely lighter and much thinner anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen density and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Defy (2021) features a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.