Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's general score of 77. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's design is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with just a bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.